>


Lotus Elan unveiled

Posted by: leka-S  /  Category: European Cars




From WCF

Quote:

Remember the Lotus Elan from the early 90′s? Forget it! The company has unveiled a reincarnated rear-wheel drive model.

While it looks like an angry Honda CR-Z, the new performance coupe aims to become a legitimate rival to the Porsche 911. This is no easy task, but Lotus feels confident in their newest model.

Power is provided by a mid-mounted 4.0-liter V6 engine with 450 PS (331 kW / 444 hp) and 465 Nm (343 lb-ft) of toque. It is backed up by a seven-speed DCT transmission, which enables the 1,295 kg (2,855 lb) car to accelerate from 0-100 km/h in 3.5 seconds and hit a top speed of 310 km/h (193 mph). If that fails to attract your attention, perhaps you’ll be interested in the hybrid variant which will have CO2 emissions as low as 199 g/km.

On sale in the fall of 2013, the Elan will carry a base price of approximately £75,000

Read more: http://www.worldcarfans.com/11009302…#ixzz112uDKwva


Same front end as the other 4 new Lotii



Volkswagen eyeing NASCAR entry?

Posted by: Kaoss  /  Category: Motorsport




VIA MOTORTREND

Quote:

The latest entry into America’s most popular motorsports series could very well be the first ever from Germany. According to Matthias Muller, the newly appointed CEO of Porsche, Volkswagen Group — his employer’s parent company — is considering entering NASCAR. Should it follow through, Volkswagen would be just the second foreign automaker to participate in NASCAR. Toyota was first, entering the competition in 2007.

The German automaker will reportedly begin discussions with NASCAR officials once the current season ends in late November. One of the owners that Volkswagen is considering team up with is Roger Penske, who is currently associated with Dodge and has a history of success in the stock car series. Currently, Penske driver Kurt Busch is in 4th place and firmly in the Chase for the Cup, while other regular cup drivers Brad Keselowski and Sam Hornish Jr. are 26th and 27th, respectively.

The factors that would not only enable a NASCAR entry, but also make marketing sense, are Volkswagen’s new Chattanooga, Tennessee, assembly plant and the enigmatic "New Midsize Sedan" that will be built there. Whatever it ends up being called, it’s the most likely base for a NASCAR entry and also the most likely source of growth for Volkswagen, which has set ambitious sales targets in the coming years.

What do you think? Does it make sense for Volkswagen to enter NASCAR with the New Midsize Sedan, or will the German automaker be wasting its time and money?

Read more: http://wot.motortrend.com/6690148/mo…#ixzz112mwLq5k


Interesting, I guess we’ll see Herbie racing around soon

Lotus Eterne Concept

Posted by: Kaoss  /  Category: European Cars




Not sure if Lotus is going in the right direction…but this car DOES look quite stunning

VIA AUTOSPIES

Quote:

Enter the Eterne, the four door super saloon from Lotus.

If the Elite is elegance incarnate then the Eterne is elegance redefined.

The Eterne is a true four door, four seater sports GT. It’s the ultimate expression of refined style, sophistication and grace. But wait. An elegant, graceful sports car? Surely not.
A sports car by definition can’t be graceful. Powerful, exciting, aggressive yes, but not graceful. Yet here it is, the ultimate paradox – the Eterne. Power and grace, performance and elegance, beauty and strength all in one stunning package.

With a 5.0 litre pressure charged V8 engine delivering up to 620 PS the Eterne is aiming for best in class performance and efficiency.

In keeping with the rest of the new line-up, the Eterne will benefit from hybrid technology.
Dany Bahar, Chief Executive Officer of Group Lotus, said: “The Eterne is sensational to look and as with the rest of the range it also over delivers in all other aspects as well. Similar to the Elite, it’s a car of perfect contradictions, it’s compact yet spacious, high performing yet low emitting, relative lightweight yet still reassuringly solid.”

“We truly believe that there is a market for the Eterne, there is nothing else like it out there both in terms of design, capacity and performance. The biggest difference between the Eterne and it’s class competitors is that it’s not an evolution of an existing two-door model, it’s a deliberate and considered stand-alone creation. It’s the ultimate four door sports car.”

Sometimes there are no rules to be broken, so it is time to define them instead.

Specifications:

Layout 4 seater, front-mid-engined, rear wheel drive, all wheel drive is optional
Engine Petrol, hybrid optional
Hybrid Technology Hybrid gearbox with integrated electric motors and KERS
Cylinder V8
Capacity 5.0 litre
Power/Torque 620 PS / 720 Nm
Rev limit 8,500 rpm
0-100 km/h 4.0 seconds
Top speed 315 km/h
CO2 approx (CO2/km) 220 g/km**
Weight 1,800 kg
Seats 4
Transmission Full Hybrid transmission
Drive RWD, AWD optional
Start of production Early 2015
Enters the market Spring 2015
Price indication Circa £120,000






Some question about cool cars?

Posted by: Brad Lithium  /  Category: Other - Cars & Transportation




Does a car’s interior also get hot because it’s essentially a big piece of metal/aluminum/yada that absorbs heat? With having window tints/sunshades in mind, what can i you do to cool the car down? Would some type of insulation under the carpet/roof help in rejecting heat entering?




Audi Quattro Concept

Posted by: teXas  /  Category: European Cars




Audi Quattro concept celebrates 30th anniversary of original



Quote:

We’ve been speculating, applying the magnifying glass to spy shots and just plain wishing that the rumors were true. They are – Audi is set to debut the Quattro concept car at the Paris Motor Show in celebration of its famous all-wheel-drive system’s 30th anniversary. Drawing its inspiration from the original 1980 Audi Ur-Quattro and using some underpinnings from the current RS5, the Quattro concept features a shortened wheelbase, lower roofline and a sub-3,000 pound curb weight.

The original Ur-Quattro weighed in under 3,000 pounds and featured a turbocharged five-cylinder engine paired with a five-speed manual. Keeping in line with that spirit, the Quattro concept ditches the V8 and dual-clutch transmission from the RS5 in favor of a turbocharged inline five-cylinder engine and six-speed manual gearbox. Power output for the Quattro concept is rated at 408 horsepower and 354 pound-feet of torque. All that energy is put to the ground through Audi’s famous quattro torque-vectoring all-wheel-drive system, which in this case is setup with a 40:60 rear-biased torque split. The weight savings mixed with the power output create a vehicle with a power-weight ratio on par with that of the Audi R8 5.2 FSI.

Since this IS a modern Audi, it features stylish exterior features and a wonderful cabin space. The seats are leather-lined Sparco units that weight in at just 40 pounds apiece. The Quattro concept also makes use of the Audi MMI infotainment system. In this application, MMI includes a slew of screens useful for rally racing like classically-styled round gauges and a page for pace notes. On the outside, the Quattro concept boasts the signature Audi LED treatment, but this time it’s in the form of headlamps that adjust their direction both vertically and horizontally, as well as being able to open fully or close to a slit.

This is an exciting concept that pays homage to a true motoring classic. If Audi doesn’t find a way to put a version of this into production, we’re sure that four-ring fanboys around the world will storm Ingolstadt.


Jag-u-ar C-X75 Concept: 75th Anniversary of Jag

Posted by: Jared  /  Category: European Cars




I can’t believe no one has posted this yet. If it is a repost, please combine or close this thread. Thanks, Mods.

Jaguar has debuted their new concept the C-X75 to showcase new technologies and design language.

It looks great.

Quote:

For its 75th anniversary, Jaguar‘s unveiling the C-X75 Concept, an extended-range electric coupe showing off a new design direction for the leaping-kitty brand, along with a electric/gas turbine power source generating 780 hp. Your 21st century British supercar awaits.

Designed with the intent to move Jaguar‘s styling into something new and evolved, the C-X75 revives the promise of the XJ220 two-seat supercar from the 1990s; one vehicle that carriers every engineering resource Jaguar can muster.

The C-X75′s design mixes a number of cues from Jaguar’s modern lineup, but in shape and proportion resembles the 1966 XJ13 Le Mans prototype, a car Jaguar chief designer Ian Callum tags as "possibly the most beautiful Jaguar ever made."

But there’s no precedent in Jaguar history for the powertrain under its aluminum skin. Using four electric motors at each wheel generating 195hp each and a lithium-ion battery pack, Jaguar says the C-X75 can hit 62 mph in 3.4 seconds, with a 10.3-second dispatch of a quarter mile. The batteries carry enough energy to carry the two-seater 68 miles on electric power alone.

And when those dim, the C-X75 can refill its electric power with two micro gas turbines, paired midships, that generate 94 hp apiece, providing nearly 500 miles of additional range. The turbines can operate independently, and can be called upon to directly power the electric motors. Yoked together, the system provides 780 hp and 1187 lb.-ft. of torque to all four wheels.

Aside from aesthetics, the designers needed to deal with the forces require to keep the C-X75 stable at an estimated top speed of 205 mph. The scoops on the side feed the gas turbines, which need 25,000 liters of air per minute in operation. The exhaust gases from the turbines feed into the aerodynamics as well.

In the cabin, Jaguar has designed a series of new touchscreens, including one that can mimic the dash of a D-Type. The center dash also sports a Bremont-designed clock, and instead of speakers, the Bowers & Wilkins sound system uses transducers lining the doors and bulkhead in a honeycomb pattern, creating a system that can actively cancel some of the noise from the mini jet engines behind the passengers’ spines.

For three-quarters of a century, Jaguar has embodied the highs and lows of Britain’s auto industry. Left for dead several times, Jaguar has struggled into a semblance of financial stability following its sale by Ford to India’s Tata Motors in 2008. But it has shied from made an overarching statement of purpose about its future under new ownership until now. If it can put some of the C-X75′s technological bounty into a real vehicle, Jaguar could craft a few more years as glorious as any from the previous 75.



source: http://jalopnik.com/5651187/jaguar-c…rom-the-future

There’s a video, too, if you follow the link to the full article including many more pictures of the interior and exterior.

A Favorite The World Round: Honda Civic (1973)

Posted by: Jared  /  Category: Asia & Pacific Cars




With the Honda S600 discontinued Honda decided to bet the farm on the automotive car game.

In 1973 we see the introduction of one of the most successful cars ever produced; The Honda Civic. The Civic is currently in its eighth generation of production.

Here is Car And Driver’s review of the Civic when it hit America soil in 1972 for the 1973 model year:

Quote:

Honda has finally become a car builder. Contrary to what your neighbor may have told you, the 600 sedans and coupes you see nipping around the ankles of Buicks and Biscaynes on the Los Angeles freeways are not cars. And neither was the old imitation-Sprite sports car that everybody (including your Honda dealer) has forgotten about by now. All of those devices were more like enclosed motorcycles—with four wheels as a concession to riders without balance—and they never really fooled anybody. But Honda is canceling out of the semi-car market now. As soon as the dealers roll their current supply of 600s out the door the transition will be complete. Because, waiting to take its place, is the new Civic, at $1973 P.O.E. a serious contender in the under-$2000 real car market. . . and, if the automotive price spiral continues, perhaps the only contender before long.

As an introduction, let us tell you that there is absolutely nothing radical nor innovative about the Civic. And that should be reassuring beyond measure to all of you potential customers who failed to appreciate the racket of the 600′s unique air-cooled, upright 2-banger engine. Or who couldn’t quite master the clever dash-mounted shifter. Nor is the Civic another one of those Japanese micro-cars that tremble fearfully as they cut through the bow wave of a Peterbilt. Instead, it’s what Honda likes to think of as the perfect urban car (hence the name Civic, if you can follow that logic). But before you can finish stuffing the Civic into that pigeon hole, Honda spokesmen are quick to point out that it’s perfectly at home on freeways and cross-country expressways as well. Another half-size car for all seasons . . . if we are to believe the manufacturer’s glossy descriptions.

Better that you should see the Civic as an urban car, we think, and that recommendation is based purely on its size. At 139.8 inches in overall length it fits in about halfway between the true micro-cars (Honda 600 and Minis) and what Americans tend to think of as standard little cars (Fiat 128, Datsun 1200 and Toyota Corolla). And along with these compact dimensions is a corresponding light weight (1536 lbs.). In crowded metropolitan areas the advantages of such a miniature automobile are obvious. The Civic’s maneuverability and economy are exceeded only by a motorcycle. But those credits are transformed by laws of physics into debits on the open highway. Gusty breezes feel like gale force winds and while the Civic may not tremble fearfully in the bow wake of a semi, it does cringe noticeably. None of that is bad engineering. It’s just an inherent quality of small cars . . . and the reason they are best suited to urban service.

Earlier it was mentioned that there is nothing radical about the Civic’s mechanical layout. It is, in fact, absolutely conventional in the Mini/Austin America/Simca 1204 mold of small cars. The Civic’s in-line, 4-cylinder engine is transversely mounted in front where it drives the front wheels. The suspension is independent all around, in this case done with MacPherson struts and coil springs. The transmission is a 4-speed, all-synchro device with a 2-speed Hondamatic optional. Brakes are discs in front, drums in back, and power assisted. All of this machinery is attached as simply and efficiently as possible to a passenger carrying compartment of four persons capacity. The idea is to keep mechanical intrusions to a minimum and Honda engineers have been particularly successful in this because, in addition to the absence of a drive-line tunnel which is inherent in this type of design, the wheel arches are also commendably small. The Civic is perhaps the only car of this size in which the driver doesn’t have to angle his feet toward the center of the car to avoid the left front wheel housing. And it also has a full-width rear seat. So, in general, the Civic scores excellent marks in space utilization. There are limitations however. The front seats are fine. They are comfortable with reclining back rests and a good range of fore-and-aft adjustment. Adults in the six-foot range will have no complaints about leg, hip and head room. But the same cannot be said for the back. By compromising front leg room somewhat the same adults will be able to accommodate their knees in back but there is no solution to that lack of rear head room. About 5’10" is the height limit for rear seat passengers. Which strikes us as a poor trade off. Little shoe box sedans do not rely on beauty for their appeal and even if they did, ballooning the Civic’s roof up an extra inch or so wouldn’t have destroyed what the critics would call classic proportions. But it would have made the car more useful and that, it would seem, is what this kind of machine is all about.

Instead, Honda has concentrated on thorough engineering to broaden the Civic’s operating range. And they have been successful. More than anything else, Honda is known for its engines. The one in the Civic is a charmer. And it makes enough horsepower so that no one can ever classify the car as underpowered. Its acceleration is not only better than that of VWs and other small displacement competitors like the Toyota Corolla 1200 but it also exceeds that of the standard engine Pinto as well. And with a top speed of 88 mph, the Civic is no sitting duck on the freeway either.

All of this power comes from a slightly long stroke, 1200cc single overhead camshaft Four. Unlike the air-cooled 600, this one is water-cooled, which does wonders for noise level. It idles quietly, no louder than a conventional Detroit intermediate sedan, and even the 82 dBA it generates under wide-open throttle acceleration is moderate for this kind of car.

Cruising is peaceful if you are content to move along at about 60 mph, but the volume increases markedly between 65 and 70 mph to a level of 80.5 dBA at the higher speed. This provides a kind of psychological barrier to speeding because, even though the Civic is powerful enough to easily cruise at relatively high speeds, we noticed a tendency to stay right at 65 mph. This tends to emphasize—and unfairly so, we might add—the urban nature of the Civic. In truth, it is no noisier at high speeds than its competitors, but because it is so much quieter at low speeds it seems better suited to city traffic.
Apart from a low noise level, the Honda’s engine is remarkable for the way it starts when warm. It lights instantly. Which is rare and therefore conspicuous in this day of reluctant emission-controlled engines. But it has suffered from de-smogging in other ways. Giant holes in its throttle response for one. At certain speeds, when you depress the accelerator, the car actually slows down and you have to go almost clear to the floor before it picks up again. That always happens just when you need a squirt of power to squeeze into a more advantageous spot in traffic.

While Honda engineers have been careful to provide certain basic qualities that are usually lacking in small cars—power and silence to name two—there are other areas that did not receive proper attention. One of them is clutch action. It chatters vigorously when you start out. And no amount of feathering the pedal will drive around it.

The front steering geometry is not a polished design either. The Civic has enough power (the 600 didn’t) so that you can feel the front wheels struggling to straighten themselves as you accelerate through a tight turn. This will do no harm to either you or the car . . . but it does make more work for the driver, work that doesn’t have to be there if the designers had drawn their lines differently.

The final objection is ride quality. It’s plenty hard, more so than any of the competition. And it pitches too. Those rocking horse motions have all but been forgotten by drivers of modern cars, particularly on freeways, but the Honda will revive your memory. Granted, the smaller the car, the harder it is to make it ride well but Honda should have tried harder.

The Civic is far more successful if you look at it from the point of view of driver convenience. The interior layout is highly efficient. The doors are big enough to provide easy access and once inside you’re spared the bus-like driving position that was always a part of the Mini and the Austin America. Honda engineers have managed to prop the steering wheel up at a civilized angle and position all of the controls where they can be found without a second look. At first the choice of materials and the style of the interior decor seem exactly typical of low-buck Japanese cars. Plenty of exterior-colored sheetmetal meets the eye and the door panels are simply islands of vinyl on an enameled expanse of metal door. But then you begin to notice the clever touches. The instrument panel is enormously successful. Two gauges are clustered in one pod directly before the driver and the rest of the panel’s width is given over to a package tray, much like that in the BMW 3.0CS. And instead of fixing a console to the floor between the seats, there is a tray outboard of each front seat down by the sills (if nothing else, handier than penny loafers for keeping toll money). As is common these days, much of the dash and other interior fittings are made up of molded plastic panels, but those in the Honda are of exceptional quality. The result of all of this is that while the Civic is clearly a small car in every sense of the word it is not, happily enough, cheap.

In fact, if you aren’t careful, you could end up with an expensive Civic because Honda dealers stock enough options—everything from automatic transmissions through roof racks to air conditioners. But the basic Civic comes in two denominations; the two-door sedan, which is the subject of this test, and the three door Hatchback. They are exactly alike except that the conventional trunklid and fixed rear seat of the sedan are replaced by an upward-hinged rear window and fold-down seat in the Hatchback. If hauling capacity is a serious concern, you should opt for the Hatchback even though the high liftover situation in back is inconvenient. The sedan’s trunk is simply too small. The compartment’s vertical dimension is enough for two medium suitcases laid flat and stacked one atop the other but once inside there isn’t enough depth to allow the door to close. So the utility of the Hatchback will cost you an additional $85.

After driving the Civic one conclusion is inescapable: Honda has firmly committed itself to the car business. And to back up that observation, the word from the head office is that the number of dealers will be doubled in the next year. Since the 600 is being discontinued, that leaves the Civic as the main and only fare. For convenience on congested inner city streets it is without peer and to drive it is better—much better—Austin America. Many cars have entered the marketplace with less.


source: http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/…ived_road_test

A Favorite The World Round: Honda Civic (1973)

Posted by: Jared  /  Category: Car Multimedia & Games




With the Honda S600 discontinued Honda decided to bet the farm on the automotive car game.

In 1973 we see the introduction of one of the most successful cars ever produced; The Honda Civic. The Civic is currently in its eighth generation of production.

Here is Car And Driver’s review of the Civic when it hit America soil in 1972 for the 1973 model year:

Quote:

Honda has finally become a car builder. Contrary to what your neighbor may have told you, the 600 sedans and coupes you see nipping around the ankles of Buicks and Biscaynes on the Los Angeles freeways are not cars. And neither was the old imitation-Sprite sports car that everybody (including your Honda dealer) has forgotten about by now. All of those devices were more like enclosed motorcycles—with four wheels as a concession to riders without balance—and they never really fooled anybody. But Honda is canceling out of the semi-car market now. As soon as the dealers roll their current supply of 600s out the door the transition will be complete. Because, waiting to take its place, is the new Civic, at $1973 P.O.E. a serious contender in the under-$2000 real car market. . . and, if the automotive price spiral continues, perhaps the only contender before long.

As an introduction, let us tell you that there is absolutely nothing radical nor innovative about the Civic. And that should be reassuring beyond measure to all of you potential customers who failed to appreciate the racket of the 600′s unique air-cooled, upright 2-banger engine. Or who couldn’t quite master the clever dash-mounted shifter. Nor is the Civic another one of those Japanese micro-cars that tremble fearfully as they cut through the bow wave of a Peterbilt. Instead, it’s what Honda likes to think of as the perfect urban car (hence the name Civic, if you can follow that logic). But before you can finish stuffing the Civic into that pigeon hole, Honda spokesmen are quick to point out that it’s perfectly at home on freeways and cross-country expressways as well. Another half-size car for all seasons . . . if we are to believe the manufacturer’s glossy descriptions.

Better that you should see the Civic as an urban car, we think, and that recommendation is based purely on its size. At 139.8 inches in overall length it fits in about halfway between the true micro-cars (Honda 600 and Minis) and what Americans tend to think of as standard little cars (Fiat 128, Datsun 1200 and Toyota Corolla). And along with these compact dimensions is a corresponding light weight (1536 lbs.). In crowded metropolitan areas the advantages of such a miniature automobile are obvious. The Civic’s maneuverability and economy are exceeded only by a motorcycle. But those credits are transformed by laws of physics into debits on the open highway. Gusty breezes feel like gale force winds and while the Civic may not tremble fearfully in the bow wake of a semi, it does cringe noticeably. None of that is bad engineering. It’s just an inherent quality of small cars . . . and the reason they are best suited to urban service.

Earlier it was mentioned that there is nothing radical about the Civic’s mechanical layout. It is, in fact, absolutely conventional in the Mini/Austin America/Simca 1204 mold of small cars. The Civic’s in-line, 4-cylinder engine is transversely mounted in front where it drives the front wheels. The suspension is independent all around, in this case done with MacPherson struts and coil springs. The transmission is a 4-speed, all-synchro device with a 2-speed Hondamatic optional. Brakes are discs in front, drums in back, and power assisted. All of this machinery is attached as simply and efficiently as possible to a passenger carrying compartment of four persons capacity. The idea is to keep mechanical intrusions to a minimum and Honda engineers have been particularly successful in this because, in addition to the absence of a drive-line tunnel which is inherent in this type of design, the wheel arches are also commendably small. The Civic is perhaps the only car of this size in which the driver doesn’t have to angle his feet toward the center of the car to avoid the left front wheel housing. And it also has a full-width rear seat. So, in general, the Civic scores excellent marks in space utilization. There are limitations however. The front seats are fine. They are comfortable with reclining back rests and a good range of fore-and-aft adjustment. Adults in the six-foot range will have no complaints about leg, hip and head room. But the same cannot be said for the back. By compromising front leg room somewhat the same adults will be able to accommodate their knees in back but there is no solution to that lack of rear head room. About 5’10" is the height limit for rear seat passengers. Which strikes us as a poor trade off. Little shoe box sedans do not rely on beauty for their appeal and even if they did, ballooning the Civic’s roof up an extra inch or so wouldn’t have destroyed what the critics would call classic proportions. But it would have made the car more useful and that, it would seem, is what this kind of machine is all about.

Instead, Honda has concentrated on thorough engineering to broaden the Civic’s operating range. And they have been successful. More than anything else, Honda is known for its engines. The one in the Civic is a charmer. And it makes enough horsepower so that no one can ever classify the car as underpowered. Its acceleration is not only better than that of VWs and other small displacement competitors like the Toyota Corolla 1200 but it also exceeds that of the standard engine Pinto as well. And with a top speed of 88 mph, the Civic is no sitting duck on the freeway either.

All of this power comes from a slightly long stroke, 1200cc single overhead camshaft Four. Unlike the air-cooled 600, this one is water-cooled, which does wonders for noise level. It idles quietly, no louder than a conventional Detroit intermediate sedan, and even the 82 dBA it generates under wide-open throttle acceleration is moderate for this kind of car.

Cruising is peaceful if you are content to move along at about 60 mph, but the volume increases markedly between 65 and 70 mph to a level of 80.5 dBA at the higher speed. This provides a kind of psychological barrier to speeding because, even though the Civic is powerful enough to easily cruise at relatively high speeds, we noticed a tendency to stay right at 65 mph. This tends to emphasize—and unfairly so, we might add—the urban nature of the Civic. In truth, it is no noisier at high speeds than its competitors, but because it is so much quieter at low speeds it seems better suited to city traffic.
Apart from a low noise level, the Honda’s engine is remarkable for the way it starts when warm. It lights instantly. Which is rare and therefore conspicuous in this day of reluctant emission-controlled engines. But it has suffered from de-smogging in other ways. Giant holes in its throttle response for one. At certain speeds, when you depress the accelerator, the car actually slows down and you have to go almost clear to the floor before it picks up again. That always happens just when you need a squirt of power to squeeze into a more advantageous spot in traffic.

While Honda engineers have been careful to provide certain basic qualities that are usually lacking in small cars—power and silence to name two—there are other areas that did not receive proper attention. One of them is clutch action. It chatters vigorously when you start out. And no amount of feathering the pedal will drive around it.

The front steering geometry is not a polished design either. The Civic has enough power (the 600 didn’t) so that you can feel the front wheels struggling to straighten themselves as you accelerate through a tight turn. This will do no harm to either you or the car . . . but it does make more work for the driver, work that doesn’t have to be there if the designers had drawn their lines differently.

The final objection is ride quality. It’s plenty hard, more so than any of the competition. And it pitches too. Those rocking horse motions have all but been forgotten by drivers of modern cars, particularly on freeways, but the Honda will revive your memory. Granted, the smaller the car, the harder it is to make it ride well but Honda should have tried harder.

The Civic is far more successful if you look at it from the point of view of driver convenience. The interior layout is highly efficient. The doors are big enough to provide easy access and once inside you’re spared the bus-like driving position that was always a part of the Mini and the Austin America. Honda engineers have managed to prop the steering wheel up at a civilized angle and position all of the controls where they can be found without a second look. At first the choice of materials and the style of the interior decor seem exactly typical of low-buck Japanese cars. Plenty of exterior-colored sheetmetal meets the eye and the door panels are simply islands of vinyl on an enameled expanse of metal door. But then you begin to notice the clever touches. The instrument panel is enormously successful. Two gauges are clustered in one pod directly before the driver and the rest of the panel’s width is given over to a package tray, much like that in the BMW 3.0CS. And instead of fixing a console to the floor between the seats, there is a tray outboard of each front seat down by the sills (if nothing else, handier than penny loafers for keeping toll money). As is common these days, much of the dash and other interior fittings are made up of molded plastic panels, but those in the Honda are of exceptional quality. The result of all of this is that while the Civic is clearly a small car in every sense of the word it is not, happily enough, cheap.

In fact, if you aren’t careful, you could end up with an expensive Civic because Honda dealers stock enough options—everything from automatic transmissions through roof racks to air conditioners. But the basic Civic comes in two denominations; the two-door sedan, which is the subject of this test, and the three door Hatchback. They are exactly alike except that the conventional trunklid and fixed rear seat of the sedan are replaced by an upward-hinged rear window and fold-down seat in the Hatchback. If hauling capacity is a serious concern, you should opt for the Hatchback even though the high liftover situation in back is inconvenient. The sedan’s trunk is simply too small. The compartment’s vertical dimension is enough for two medium suitcases laid flat and stacked one atop the other but once inside there isn’t enough depth to allow the door to close. So the utility of the Hatchback will cost you an additional $85.

After driving the Civic one conclusion is inescapable: Honda has firmly committed itself to the car business. And to back up that observation, the word from the head office is that the number of dealers will be doubled in the next year. Since the 600 is being discontinued, that leaves the Civic as the main and only fare. For convenience on congested inner city streets it is without peer and to drive it is better—much better—Austin America. Many cars have entered the marketplace with less.


source: http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/…ived_road_test

Peugeot Concept EX1

Posted by: Brad Lithium  /  Category: Autos




Peugeot EX1Nun we can on these EX1 Peugeot concept, errrm … well its fast. However this car follows the Pips Tesla for example a sample weighted by Tesla in several areas, but unfortunately, unlike the Tesla, you do not become (probably) a unique situation, EX1, in his famous 200 years never simply too Peugeot kaufen. &; # 13 If we say quickly, is enough, get this cat can not phrase to 60mph in 3. 58 seconds the thing is the Tesla by quite a small few, but from there things absolutely durchgeknallt. The Peugeot EX1, the speed increase that indeed build him and his incredible hitting top speed of about 160 miles an hour in that state of 6th 6 seconds … then think … 0-60mph in 3. 6 seconds, the next 60-160 miles an hour in three seconds the acceleration rate of the beginning rather then lose … for 3 seconds, a speed of around 100 miles an hour … that it becomes a hell hurry up. Around you a perspective, how this rate of acceleration is rapid, typically meet with Formula One car the same 160 miles in about an hour markers 7. 8 seconds certainly incredibly quickly, and not so far behind the time the EX1, it is the distribution of acceleration, such as Formula One is a car to 60mph in 1 goes wrong. 7 seconds, the destruction of EX1 as speed, but then lasts 60-160 miles an hour about 6 seconds compared to the EX1 is 3 for Peugeot EX1 required is amazing 280 miles on a single charge is gone The performance seems to view with easy weight and high power batteries could be quite possible, however, so you were slightly optimistic with the easiest of gefiederten affects a train ride on the accelerator as you could go to 280 000 in this car, without the incentive, however, either on a floor for us. It is a fine example of that with electricity, and a great view of the high performance sports car of the future Super can be reached, do not give doubt that 20 or 30 years, the same thing about Lamborghini and Ferrari models have electric cars and get to be such that the Peugeot EX1 how many years ago.

GTA4 – Supercars – Fast Cars – Cool Cars

Posted by: Brad Lithium  /  Category: Everything Else




This video shows the the supercars of GTA4. I would say they are the coolest cars in the game :p plz enjoy.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers